Dialogue modelling and the remit of core grammar
- In confronting the challenge of providing formal models of dialogue, with its plethora of fragments and rich variation in modes of context-dependent construal, it might seem that linguists face two types of methodological choice: either (a) conversation employs dialogue-speciﬁc mechanisms, for which a grammar speciﬁc to such activity must be constructed; or (b) variation arises due to independent parsing/production systems which invoke a process-neutral grammar. However, as dialogue research continues to de-velop, there are intermediate possibilities, and in this paper we discuss the approach developed within Dynamic Syntax, a grammar framework within which, not only the parser, but indeed “syntax” itself are just a single mechanism allowing the pro-gressive construction of semantic representations in context. Here we take as a case study the set of phenomena classiﬁable as clariﬁcations, reformulations, fragment requests and corrections accompanied by extensions, and argue that though these may seem to be uniquely constitutive of dialogue, they are grounded in the mechanisms of apposition equivalently usable in monologue for presenting reformulations, extensions, self-corrections etc.
- Research areas:
- Type of Publication:
- In Proceedings
- Book title:
- Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Semantics
- Tilburg, The Netherlands